A 15-year, $10bn take-or-pay gas contract between the Leviathan partners and Jordan's NEPCO has now outlasted three Jordanian parliamentary motions to cancel it. Why it endures.
The 2016 gas purchase agreement between the Leviathan consortium and Jordan's National Electric Power Company (NEPCO) is the most politically contested commercial contract in the region and one of the most operationally stable. Annual flow has been roughly 3.4 bcm/year since 2020, essentially unchanged through three Jordanian elections, two Israeli governments, the Negev Forum's ascent and stall, and the post-October-7 rupture.
Why parliamentary motions don't stop deliveries
The Jordanian Parliament has passed multiple non-binding resolutions calling for cancellation. None has translated into government action because:
-
The contract's sovereign counterparty is NEPCO, not the Hashemite Kingdom directly. Cancellation requires NEPCO to default — which would trigger commercial arbitration in a forum (UNCITRAL/ICC) where Jordan would almost certainly lose.
-
NEPCO has no realistic alternative supplier at the contracted price. Egyptian gas via the Arab Gas Pipeline is more expensive and less reliable.
-
The IMF program ties Jordan's hands. Reliable, dollar-denominated input costs for electricity are part of the macroeconomic stability story. Walking away from a take-or-pay obligation creates a fiscal hole the IMF would notice.
What the contract teaches about the wider region
The Jordan contract is the cleanest case study in why commercial energy ties survive political volatility better than political agreements do. The Abraham Accords trade flows are still small. The Negev Forum technical tracks have stalled. The Israel-Egypt EMG pipeline runs continuously. The pattern is consistent: long-tenor commercial infrastructure with take-or-pay floors is the most durable form of regional cooperation, precisely because it is least visible.
For investors thinking about the next layer of cross-border infrastructure (East Med electric interconnectors, hydrogen pipelines, IMEC rail freight), the Jordan-gas template is the model worth studying.
More on Israeli Energy & Gas
- Israel's Energy Economy: Gas, Oil, and the Corridors That Move Them
- Leviathan Phase 1B — The Export Expansion Decision
- Leviathan and the Egyptian Offtake
- EastMed After the Pipeline
- The Eilat-Ashkelon Pipeline's Strategic Second Life
- INGL and the Natural Gas Pipeline Grid
How we report: Olam stories draw on public filings, company disclosures and named sources, checked by our editors. Read our methodology · Corrections
